Making a python Object with attributes, (pythonic? i don't think so)

Pretty neat?

	>>> obj = lambda: None
	>>> obj.data = 'orange; '
	>>> obj.chunk = 'aerrrr'
	>>> obj.data
	'orange; '
	>>> obj.chunk
	'aerrrr'
	# if you don't know at runtime what the attributes will be.
	# use setattr
	>>> setattr(obj, 'new_attr', 'my value')
	>>> obj.new_attr
	'my value'

view raw simple_object_with_attributes.py hosted with ❤ by GitHub

here's a test of the getatrribute() and setattr() methods of an object.

	obj_one = lambda: None
	obj_two = lambda: None
	obj_three = lambda: None
	entity_indices = '_0','_1','_2'
	def crazy_yield():
	for i in range(40):
	yield(i)
	gen_obj = crazy_yield()
	def fill_attributes(entity_indices, obj):
	for attr in entity_indices:
	setattr(obj, attr, next(gen_obj))
	for obj in obj_one, obj_two, obj_three:
	fill_attributes(entity_indices, obj)
	for obj in obj_one, obj_two, obj_three:
	for attr in entity_indices:
	print(getattr(obj, attr))

view raw grandmaster.py hosted with ❤ by GitHub

The danger of objects is from my experience that it can cause uglier less comprehensible code. Generally the same code effect is written using a dictionary and keys with less code.